Chris Wondra . com

School teacher, dad, homeowner turns superhero but has to learn his powers along the way

Chris Wondra . com header image 2

Why do anything . . .

July 20th, 2007 · 6 Comments

I think about creativity, and why we might be here, and how the two are related.

I think about flow, of bending time, of being completely engaged and engrossed.

I think about self, about selfish acts of creation or expression.

I think of losing myself in acts of passion.

I think about motivation.

And I think about how fear clogs it all up.

I’ve been reading a very interesting book that, at times, addresses all of these topics. It’s a monster novel by Ayn Rand entitled, The Fountainhead.

It’s one of those books that I’m going to have to read again with a pen handy from the start. There are so many great passages. So many great messages.

I’m nearing the end now, and the passages are jumping out at me like lightning in a dark night.

They may be meaningless without the supporting context, but I’m going to collect a few of them here anyway. These few passages are relating a conversation between architects. One wants the other to design a project without any credit.

Peter Keating wants Howard Roark to create a housing development and let Peter Keating take all the credit, fame and glory for it–because Peter Keating knows he can’t get the contract. He’s not good enough. Howard Roark is the one with the talent and wisdom. It won’t be the first time Keating has asked for help in this way.

The thing to understand as you read this is that creating buildings and solving the problems of each one is Roark’s passion. He doesn’t do it for money or fame or any result whatever.

He does it to create.

He does it for the passion of creation.

Roark is the selfish one. He creates for himself. For the experience of creating.

Keating, on the other hand, is a parasite. He has always done things for the approval of others. He’s more concerned with social status, opinion, and recognition–the results–than anything else.

The bottom line here is that Keating is asking Roark to save him–again. Both of them understand the other completely. I’ll start with Roark saying:

“Can you think of any reason why I should want to save your life?”

“No.”

“Well?”

“It’s a great public project, Howard. A humanitarian undertaking. Think of the poor people who live in the slums. If you can give them decent comfort within their means, you’ll have the satisfaction of performing a noble deed.”

“Peter, you were more honest than that yesterday.”

His eyes dropped, his voice low, Keating said:

“You will love designing it.”

“Yes, Peter. Now you’re speaking my language.”

“What do you want?”

“Now listen to me. I’ve been working on the problem of low rent housing for years. I never thought of the poor people in slums. I thought of the potentialities of our modern world. The new materials, the means, the chances to take and use. There are so many products of man’s genius around us today. There are such great possibilities to exploit. To build cheaply, simply, intelligently. I’ve had a lot of time to study. I didn’t have much to do after the Stoddard Temple. I didn’t expect results. I worked because I can’t look at any material without thinking: What could be done with it? And the moment I think that, I’ve got to do it. To find the answer, to break the thing. I’ve worked on it for years. I loved it. I worked because it was a problem I wanted to solve. You want to know how to build a unit to rent for fifteen dollars a month? I’ll show you how to build it for ten.”

Keating made an involuntary movement forward,

“But first, I want you to think and tell me what made me give years to this work. Money? Fame? Charity? Altruism?” Keating shook his head slowly. “All right. You’re beginning to understand. So whatever we do, don’t let’s talk about the poor people in the slums. They have nothing to do with it . . .

“. . . Peter, before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man that can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the secondary consequences. The work, not the people. Your own action, not any possible object of your charity. I’ll be glad if people who need it find a better manner of living in a house I designed. But that’s not the motive of my work. Nor my reason. Nor my reward.

No related posts

Tags: Creativity · Growth · Learning · mysteries

6 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Lyrical Fool // Jul 20, 2007 at 11:43 am

    You know, since I read Atlas Shrugged a couple of years back, I’ve been wanting to read this, simply because I liked Rand and it’s a “to-read.”

    After this, I’m definitely bumping it up a few notches.

    Thanks for doing what you do, Chris.

  • 2 Lyrical Fool // Jul 20, 2007 at 11:45 am

    *pseudo edit: Anthem, not Atlas Shrugged.

    Yeah,
    I found Rand this year when I learned that I could get free class sets of her novels from the Rand Institute. Free class sets! So I got sets of each, Anthem, The Fountainhead, and Atlas Shrugged. After this Atlas Shrugged is next on my list. I can’t say that I totally understand what she’s getting at philisophically (hell, I can’t even spell the word), but I do like it. Like it a lot.
    Chris

  • 3 Mark // Aug 8, 2007 at 6:29 pm

    Chris,

    Where the heck are you? I would think you would have more creative time during the summer. Your voice is missed.

    Hi Mark,

    While I have missed blogging, I am currently in the midst of the most incredible summer of my life. As I write this I am in the Gaylord Opryland Hotel in Nashville Tennessee. Before this trip, we spent 3 and a half weeks in Denmark! While I haven’t had the time or energy to blog about all of my travels, I certainly plan to share everything I’ve learned soon. And I’ve learned and experienced some incredible things!

    Thanks for checking in! I’m still here.

    I’ll write more soon.

    Chris

  • 4 Nolan O'Brien // Sep 10, 2007 at 9:46 pm

    Hello Chris Wondra,
    I’m a student of your 8th grade first block class in the year of 2007. I am very interested in the book you mentioned above, The Fountainhead, and was wondering if maybe it could be a class project to read this book or even just have you copy a few of your favorite parts and have us as a class read this. If this is possible that would be excellent, if not thanks for the effort I’ll look into renting this from the local library. Thanks Again, Nolan O’Brien

  • 5 Sam Sizer // Sep 11, 2007 at 12:03 am

    Hey Mr. Wondra!

    This is Sam Sizer of your 3rd block class, I originally found your site this morning. I really think you have a great journal! I’ve read the thing about iGod. Interesting! I liked the book you mentioned above. I am sorry if you do not want me here! I think you’re a great writer and will probably add a lot to my skills this year since this is what I need! I work for the IRA and some other independent writing services where I get sums of $$$ for writing online, and your in class work is really helpful!

    Thanks!

    ~Sam Sizer

  • 6 Jace Marek // Sep 12, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    hey mr.wandra
    i am a student in the 8th grade 3rd block class and this book u are talking about sounds realy good and like nolan said i think we should read it in the class as a prodject but i am going to try and find it in the library or mabey u might possibly have an extrathat i could barrow well ill coment later seya…. o ya sorry about the mr.wandie thing

    Jace,

    Where in the world did you ever get the idea that it’s perfectly fine to leave a comment with that many mistakes on a Language Arts teacher’s blog? I mean, you didn’t even bother to spell my name correctly–and it’s right at the top of the page!!

    I don’t mind the intelligent comments that students leave here. In fact I rather like them. But if that’s how you’re going to do it–don’t bother. I promise you, I’ll just delete it from now on. This was bordering on downright disrespect–because I know you know better.

    Mr. Wondra

Leave a Comment